Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra
2. Classical Western Foundations
2.1 Greek origins, Plato & Aristotle
Key Aristotelian legacy: the distinction between just and perverse regimes, same structure can be good or evil depending on whose interest it serves. This anticipates modern constitutionalism.
2.1a Machiavelli, the realist turn
- Niccolò Machiavelli (The Prince, 1513, published 1532; Discourses on Livy, 1517): Separated politics from Christian moral theology. A ruler must be both feared and loved, but if forced to choose, fear is safer. Virtù (ruler's skill) vs Fortuna (chance). Founded modern realpolitik; influenced Kautilya comparisons.
- Discourses (often forgotten) makes him a republican, he preferred a free republic with civic virtue to principalities.
2.2 Social contract tradition (17th,18th c.)
The question: If humans once lived in a "state of nature," why and how did they submit to political authority?
Insight: These three responses map onto three modern instincts, Hobbesian: the State must be strong (law-and-order right); Lockean: the State must be limited (classical liberalism); Rousseauian: the State IS the collective will (popular sovereignty, democratic left). Most modern debates are re-runs of this triangle.
Indian relevance: The Preamble's "We, the people of India... do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution" is pure Rousseau, the people give themselves a Constitution, rather than receive one from above. Contrast with the Japanese Constitution imposed by US occupation (1947).
3. Core Ideological Traditions
3.1 Liberalism
Core claim: The individual is prior to the community. Freedom = absence of coercion. The State exists to protect rights, not to pursue collective goals.
(a) Classical Liberalism (17th,19th c.)
- John Locke: Life, liberty, property as natural rights
- Adam Smith: Invisible hand; market coordination
- J.S. Mill (On Liberty, 1859): Harm Principle, "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others"
- Isaiah Berlin (Two Concepts of Liberty, 1958):
- Negative liberty: freedom from interference
- Positive liberty: freedom to self-realization
- Berlin warned: positive liberty is dangerous, it lets authoritarians claim they're liberating people against their will
(b) Modern/Welfare Liberalism (20th c.)
- T.H. Green, L.T. Hobhouse: Liberty requires social preconditions, food, health, education
- John Rawls (A Theory of Justice, 1971), the most influential political philosopher of the 20th c.:
- Veil of Ignorance: Principles of justice should be chosen without knowing your own race, gender, class, talents
- Two Principles:
- Each person has an equal right to the most extensive basic liberties compatible with similar liberties for all
- Social/economic inequalities are permissible ONLY IF (a) they benefit the least advantaged (Difference Principle) (b) attached to positions open to all under fair equality of opportunity
- Priority: Liberty > Opportunity > Difference Principle (lexical ordering)
(c) Libertarianism / Neo-liberalism
- Robert Nozick (Anarchy, State and Utopia, 1974), response to Rawls:
- Entitlement theory: justice in holdings = (a) just acquisition + (b) just transfer + (c) rectification of injustice
- Taxation for redistribution = forced labour
- Only legitimate state is minimal state, protecting against force, theft, fraud
- F.A. Hayek, Milton Friedman: Markets coordinate information better than planners; "road to serfdom" from planning
Indian liberalism: The Fundamental Rights chapter (Part III) is Locke + Mill + Berlin. Art 14 (equality), 19 (six freedoms, Mill's On Liberty in constitutional form), 21 (life & personal liberty, read expansively post-Maneka Gandhi 1978).
3.2 Marxism
Core claim: History is the story of class struggle; the state is the instrument of the ruling class; political liberty without economic equality is a sham.
https://deepmentor.co/guides/polity/political-theories
No comments:
Post a Comment